Reshaping sustainability in digital film and TV productions

26.8.2025
Blog, News

Digital production methods bring new perspectives on sustainability in the film and TV industry, an area that often centers on live-action filmmaking. Animation, virtual production, XR and VFX all come with great potential to diminish the carbon footprint compared to standard live-action productions – and their own specific challenges and risks. The conversation is two-fold: Technological advancements are essential for sustainable progress, while we need to critically assess the environmental impact of tools and processes in use.  

In early 2025, Audiovisual Producers Finland – APFI hosted Backstage of Tech, a webinar series bringing together industry experts who are driving sustainability in the digital film and TV to share their insights and work. This article gathers some insights from the series: identifying the environmental impact of digital production methods and highlighting the decisions that shape them.

Calculating energy consumption and carbon footprints has a huge number of pitfalls, but we got to start somewhere. We got to start comparing numbers to establish some procedures.

Dr. Alexander Kreische, Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg, on APFI’s webinar series Backstage of Tech, 20.3.2025

Digital production methods and their environmental touch points  

Digital production methods are tools and processes in all stages of film & TV production, including digital animation, visual effects (VFX), virtual production techniques such as LED wall stages, and extended reality (XR) applications. Their environmental challenges primarily revolve around energy consumption. They rely on high-performance computers, servers and digital infrastructure requiring energy, as outlined in the previous article on digital sustainability (1). Dr. Kreische points out: “Starting to monitor is the only way to learn about the real impact, and make the energy use as transparent as possible”.

Even though it is difficult to obtain exact data on the toll digital production takes on the electricity grid both locally and globally, tracking energy use and evaluating processes can reveal what choices have the greatest impact. These measurable environmental touch points can for example be hardware manufacturing (physical workstations, computers, screens), computing power required for rendering, and number of revisions.

For physical hardware, this means environmental impacts from raw material extraction, rare metals, device obsolescence, and electronic waste (2). There is a tipping point between replacing old devices with newer, more efficient ones, and adding the impact of their manufacturing, rather than extending the life of something already in use. Anssi Komulainen, Programme Director at Sitra, stresses that the most sustainable option is often to use existing tools for as long as possible, as well as rely on the minimum digital services needed to get the job done.

Rendering is one of the most energy-intensive stages of digital production. Offline rendering means computing each frame in detail, which allows for higher visual fidelity but requires long processing times and computational power. Real-time rendering, already used in virtual production and XR, generates images instantly, enabling faster iteration and more efficient workflows, though sometimes at the cost of maximum visual detail, and requiring upgraded hardware. A study by the German Animationsinstitut found offline rendering significantly more energy-intensive, making real-time rendering a promising alternative for more sustainable image generation also in animation, VFX and film production in general (3).

Optimized data management is an important step across all sections of production, lowering the carbon footprint of sending, storing and using files. These virtual assets can for example have reduced polygon counts and texture resolutions, Dr. Kreische points out. As generative AI enables the generation of endless new images and videos, minimizing data use becomes essential, Komulainen highlights.

Helping to guide sustainable choices in animation and digital film and TV production, there are resources such as the Green Animation Guide 2025. The international guidebook is developed by the French Ecoprod, together with European stakeholders (4).

Sustainability opportunities

Virtual production combines physical filming with digital environments, often using LED walls, to reduce the need for travel and set builds, and to stage scenes in entirely new settings. Virtual stages usually rely on real-time rendering. In another study by the German Animationsinstitut, a virtual production short film required required 1/3 of the energy consumption compared to an “offline” short. (5). A report by Studio Ulster at Ulster University provides similar numbers, showing that virtual production can cut the carbon footprint of large-scale productions by 20–50% (6).

Another sustainability aspect of virtual production, highlighted by Professor Declan Keeney of Ulster University, is that it shifts much of the focus from shooting to pre-production, making it easier to integrate sustainability measures from the beginning. This is backed up by R&D Lead at Helsinki XR Center Santeri Saarinen, adding that the virtual environments created can be reused long after filming. The same assets can serve multiple purposes, extending into video games or other creative projects, making content reuse an interesting sustainability advantage. Prof. Keeney mentions “Virtual production can help lower the emissions and the carbon footprint of the whole film & tv industry”, and highlights how for example scanning and recreating fragile heritage sites digitally will keep them alive for both audiences or film tourism, enabling both environmental and economical sustainability.

Sustainability measures also often go hand in hand with productivity and efficiency, which is concretely highlighted by Dupe VFX. The British VFX studio claims measuring inefficiencies gave better insights into decisions and investments, like improving rendering processes or switching to more efficient data centers. Creating show-specific sustainability reports enabled better transparency for clients (7).

A sustainable future

Sustainability is no longer a niche concern, as many stakeholders now expect brands and productions to act responsibly. The Ecoprod guide highlights younger audiences as especially vocal, which Dr. Kreische also observes from film school students. Prof. Keeney also points out that expectations on sustainable processes are coming both from the younger generation, and as criteria from funds and financiers, and he welcomes the requirement on studios and production companies to adapt and reassess their priorities. Prof. Keeney believes that sustainability demands will determine who remains competitive. “What we’re seeing is a duty of all productions to identify their carbon footprint. If you cannot identify a carbon footprint going forward years out, you will in my view not get to play in the foreign direct investment game”.

Economical and environmental choices often align, Anima producer Timo Suomi also agrees on. Less asset creation and rendering saves both money and energy. With limited budgets, productions need to be clever about costly rendering, so efficiency becomes a necessity. Suomi notes that this keeps the focus on long-term sustainability: For real change, the industry needs reliable tools and measuring that support both environmental and financial sustainability in the long run.

“Don’t just do things the way they’ve always been done”, Dr. Kreische points out. Efforts to reduce the number of revisions needed is a good place to start. He also emphasizes that sustainability needs to be built into project planning from the very beginning, since early choices are key in meeting long-term goals. From the perspective of film schools, Dr. Kreische also underlines the importance of teaching future filmmakers to make better decisions and carry forward higher demands for sustainability.

The Backstage of Tech–webinar SERIES is FOUND HERE: 

Backstage of Tech, Session 1 (27.02.2025)
Backstage of Tech, Session 2 (13.03.2025)
Backstage of Tech, Session 3 (20.03.2025)

Audiovisual Producers Finland – APFI is a non-profit association dedicated to representing the interests of Finnish audiovisual producers. Sustainability is one of the pillars of APFI’s mission, and APFI has since 2021 run national initiatives to promote environmentally sustainable practices in the industry. APFI:s work on environmental sustainability and the webinar series Backstage of Tech is funded by the NextGenerationEU-program, via the Ministry of Education and Culture.

SOURCES:

(1) Audiovisual Producers Finland, 2025, https://apfi.fi/en/ajankohtaista/the-carbon-footprint-of-digital-industries-understanding-the-hidden-impact/ 
(2) Nausicä, 2024, https://nausicacinemadurable.fr/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/the-challenges-of-the-environmental-transition-of-the-film-and-audiovisual-industry-2.pdf 
(3) Animationsinstitut, 2024, https://animationsinstitut.de/files/public/images/04-forschung/Publications/saeducatorsforum24-7_Sustainable_VFX.pdf 
(4) Ecoprod, 2025, https://ecoprod.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GREEN-ANIMATION-GUIDE-ECOPROD-20250610.pdf 
(5) Animationsinstitut, 2022, https://animationsinstitut.de/files/public/images/04-forschung/Publications/siggraph22talks-10.pdf 
(6) Studio Ulster, 2023, https://futureobservatory.org/files/dcmsreports/futureobservatory_culturalpolicyreport_studioulster.pdf 
(7) VFX Voice, 2024, https://www.vfxvoice.com/vfx-and-sustainability-reducing-carbon-footprint-its-importance-and-more/ 

Lisää kirjoituksia